Mercury News publishes an article about the agenda in Pleasant Hill:
Very interesting, yet biased article. It mentions that only "[s]everal people" on the pro-2A side gave comments, when in reality, there were far more than "several"... The article comments on only one of the many speakers who used the term "radical left wing group". Seems quite convenient to me.
The rest, typical biased coverage that favors the other side who favors desecrating the Constitution.
Oh... I don't subscribe to the Mercury News...