Thread: ccw question?
View Single Post
  #24  
Old 11-16-2012, 6:40 AM
CitaDeL's Avatar
CitaDeL CitaDeL is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Redding, CA
Posts: 5,096
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by socalblue View Post
So you would prefer to increase the risk for everyone involved, for no reason other than a crappy attitude? T-stops are at the top of the list of officer injuries/deaths. Purposely risking an escalation to what is already a potentially tense situation is simply asking for trouble.

Handing over the LTC with your ID indicates to the LEO that you take the responsibility of carrying a weapon seriously. No promises, but from my experience on both sides of a badge LTC holders that 'pass the attitude test' are considered one of the good guys & treated accordingly. Stupidity in public results in an abrupt reversal.
Attitude has absolutely no bearing on how one exercizes their rights.

The only time it should be necessary to present a LTC to a peace officer is if it is the cause of the stop/detention. In other words, it isnt a peace officer's business whether a law abiding gun owner is armed or not, if the purpose of the stop is anything other than the use of a concealled handgun.

A traffic infraction, for instance, is not a reason for a LTC holder to declare that they are armed or present their LTC.

If peace officers cannot mitigate risk or fear during a traffic stop without infringing upon an individual's civil rights, then I believe they have selected the wrong vocation.
__________________

Sometimes the law defends plunder and participates in it. Sometimes the law places the whole apparatus of judges, police, prisons and gendarmes at the service of the plunderers, and treats the victim -- when he defends himself -- as a criminal. Bastiat

“Everything the State says is a lie, and everything it has it has stolen.” Friedrich Nietzsche
Reply With Quote