He had a right to be secure in his personal effects and PC that is needed to sieze the weapon. From the information we have the rifle was not an AW. Where is there blind devotion in this case? If additional facts come to light then people will re-evaluate there position. That's how thought and reason work. You don't start with, I don't agree with a behavior therefore anything that happens to that person is ok.
So we should be able to carry a firearm for protection where things get out of control? Would you be fine if he was CC? We have two forms of carry UOC and the other which the vast majority can't get. So how is carry by the only means possible stupid and irresponsible? And no your example still does not apply
Last edited by sandman21; 11-06-2012 at 7:18 AM..