Originally Posted by greg36f
My point is, Is there anything we won't defend? Is there any point where we draw a line? Is blind devotion the best course?
I'm nobody important here, but I'll give it a shot. As far as we know, this person committed no crime and there was no legal reason to take his rifle. If we don't defend him, who do we defend? Do we just let a rogue or uneducated cop decide that this guy shouldn't have a gun, well, just because?
I'll turn your question around. Do we just not defend people who have committed no crime and have had their rights violated? If not, where do we draw the line?
P.S. Thanks for the new sig line, CitaDel