View Single Post
  #52  
Old 11-02-2012, 9:49 PM
CitaDeL's Avatar
CitaDeL CitaDeL is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Redding, CA
Posts: 5,096
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Overbear View Post
I have a curious question...lets say this leads to a lawsuit. Why not sit the other side down once it starts and they realise they are going to loose. Then offer them a deal, lawsuit gets dropped, IF the offending officer is dismissed from the force and bared from being rehired? Do that in enough lawsuits, and the cops are going to get the hint...back off or you loose your job.
This has already been covered to some extent with the mention of 'qualified immunity'. Basically, if a public servant makes a mistake, they can say 'oops' and still keep their job. What is more likely to happen is that a settlement would be reached and the city would be required to provide training in what is and what isnt an assault weapon, which is the problem Arcata PD seems to have.

(And on another note 'loose' is why we have string attached between a child's tooth and a doorknob for. 'Lose' is what we get when we dont win.)
__________________

Sometimes the law defends plunder and participates in it. Sometimes the law places the whole apparatus of judges, police, prisons and gendarmes at the service of the plunderers, and treats the victim -- when he defends himself -- as a criminal. Bastiat

“Everything the State says is a lie, and everything it has it has stolen.” Friedrich Nietzsche
Reply With Quote