View Single Post
  #830  
Old 03-28-2012, 5:56 AM
FABIO GETS GOOSED!!!'s Avatar
FABIO GETS GOOSED!!! FABIO GETS GOOSED!!! is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Beverly Hills, California
Posts: 2,589
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Updating the laundry list:
  1. the county interpreted the exception to allow events with guns secured in its 2006 motion for summary judgment
  2. the district court interpreted the exception to allow events with guns secured in its 2007 order on the motion for summary judgment
  3. the county in various briefs post-2007 interpreted the exception to allow events with guns secured
  4. Pierce argued in open court in 2009 that the exception allowed events with guns secured
  5. Weaver argued in open court in 2009 that the exception allowed gun shows with guns secured by cable to a table
  6. Weaver argues in a 9/22/10 letter brief to the 9th circuit that the exception allows the display of guns at gun shows
  7. Weaver argued in open court in 2010 that the exception allowed events with guns secured
  8. Pierce argued in open court in 2012 that the exception allowed gun shows with guns secured by cables to a table

I suppose that after at least 6 years this interpretation could still qualify as a "wholly new idea."

Last edited by FABIO GETS GOOSED!!!; 03-28-2012 at 6:03 AM..
Reply With Quote