View Single Post
  #15  
Old 11-16-2011, 12:52 AM
Librarian's Avatar
Librarian Librarian is offline
Administrator
CGN Contributor - Lifetime
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Concord
Posts: 38,607
iTrader: 4 / 100%
Blog Entries: 6
Default

In the new numbering, the law is PC 27535. Indeed, it does say 'purchase'
Quote:
(a) No person shall make an application to purchase more
than one handgun within any 30-day period.
(b) Subdivision (a) shall not apply to any of the following:
(1) Any law enforcement agency.
(2) Any agency duly authorized to perform law enforcement duties.
(3) Any state or local correctional facility.
(4) Any private security company licensed to do business in
California.
(5) Any person who is properly identified as a full-time paid
peace officer, as defined in Chapter 4.5 (commencing with Section
830) of Title 3 of Part 2, and who is authorized to, and does carry a
firearm during the course and scope of employment as a peace
officer.
(6) Any motion picture, television, or video production company or
entertainment or theatrical company whose production by its nature
involves the use of a firearm.
(7) Any person who may, pursuant to Article 2 (commencing with
Section 27600), Article 3 (commencing with Section 27650), or Article
4 (commencing with Section 27700), claim an exemption from the
waiting period set forth in Section 27540.
(8) Any transaction conducted through a licensed firearms dealer
pursuant to Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 28050).
(9) Any person who is licensed as a collector pursuant to Chapter
44 (commencing with Section 921) of Title 18 of the United States
Code and the regulations issued pursuant thereto, and has a current
certificate of eligibility issued by the Department of Justice
pursuant to Article 1 (commencing with Section 26700) of Chapter 2.
(10) The exchange of a handgun where the dealer purchased that
firearm from the person seeking the exchange within the 30-day period
immediately preceding the date of exchange or replacement.
(11) The replacement of a handgun when the person's handgun was
lost or stolen, and the person reported that firearm lost or stolen
prior to the completion of the application to purchase to any local
law enforcement agency of the city, county, or city and county in
which the person resides.
(12) The return of any handgun to its owner.
(13) A community college that is certified by the Commission on
Peace Officer Standards and Training to present the law enforcement
academy basic course or other commission-certified law enforcement
training.
However, you're missing something: an 'application to purchase' is a legal term, from PC 16190
Quote:
As used in Article 2 (commencing with Section 26800) of
Chapter 2 of Division 6 of Title 4, and in Article 1 (commencing with
Section 27500) of Chapter 4 of Division 6 of Title 4, "application
to purchase"
means either of the following:
(a) The initial completion of the register by the purchaser,
transferee, or person being loaned a firearm, as required by Section
28210.
(b) The initial completion and transmission to the Department of
Justice of the record of electronic or telephonic transfer by the
dealer on the purchaser, transferee, or person being loaned a
firearm, as required by Section 28215.
Feds require interstate to go through FFL.

CA FFL must use DROS. (PC 28100)

DROS is legally the same as 'application to purchase'.

It's illegal to submit more than one 'application to purchase' for a handgun in 30 days, unless the transaction is on the list of exceptions in 27535.

Intrafamilial handgun transfer is not on the list of exceptions there, nor in the list of transactions which are exempt from the 10-day wait and therefore exempt from 1-in-30 as specified in 27535(b)(7), nor in the PPT exception of 28050.

Therefore, interstate intrafamilial handgun transfer is subject to 1 in 30 days.
__________________
No one will really understand politics until they understand that politicians are not trying to solve our problems. They are trying to solve their own problems - of which getting elected and re-elected are number one and number two. Whatever is number three is far behind.
- Thomas Sowell
I've been saying that for years ...

There is no value at all complaining or analyzing or reading tea leaves to decide what these bills really mean or actually do; any bill with a chance to pass will be bad for gun owners.

The details only count after the Governor signs the bills.


Gregg Easterbrook’s “Law of Doomsaying”: Predict catastrophe no later than ten years hence but no sooner than five years away — soon enough to terrify people but distant enough that they will not remember that you were wrong.


Not a lawyer, just Some Guy On The Interwebs.


Reply With Quote