View Single Post
  #6  
Old 03-03-2011, 11:03 AM
Librarian's Avatar
Librarian Librarian is offline
Super Moderator
CGN Contributor - Lifetime
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Concord
Posts: 35,907
iTrader: 4 / 100%
Blog Entries: 6
Default

Utah legislation is NOT my area.

But - http://le.utah.gov/~2011/htmdoc/sbillhtm/sb0036s01.htm is the bill page; last status update was Feb 21.

A scan through the 3 Feb 2011 amended version appears to support NorCalCCW.
Quote:
74 (4) (a) In addition to meeting the other qualifications for the issuance of a concealed
75 firearm permit under this section, a nonresident applicant S. who resides in a state that
75a recognizes the validity of the Utah permit or has reciprocity with Utah's concealed firearm
75b permit law .S shall:
76 (i) hold a current concealed firearm or concealed weapon permit issued by the
77 appropriate permitting authority of the nonresident applicant's state of residency S. [ that recognizes
78 the validity of the Utah permit in that state or has reciprocity with Utah's concealed firearm
79 permit law
] .S ; and
What's odd is that it doesn't say anything at all about non-resident applicants who do not hold a CCW from their state of residence, or who hold one from a state without reciprocity with Utah. Are such other nonresident applicants out of luck?

I don't know the Utah Code at all, so I can't tell if that's addressed elsewhere.
__________________
Once again, we're in CA Bill Season.

There is no value at all complaining or analyzing or reading tea leaves to decide what these bills really mean or actually do; any bill with a chance to pass will be bad for gun owners.

Let us simply oppose them all - write, call, attend meetings with legislators and tell them they're wrong.

The details only count after the Governor signs the bills.

Not a lawyer, just Some Guy On The Interwebs.


Reply With Quote