Originally Posted by berto
Rupf's policy is problematic on many levels.
Perhaps his successor can be reasoned with?
Probably not, it seems like Livingston was Rupf's hand-picked successor. He never responded to questions about his stance on CCW. He did respond somewhat enthusiastically to a request for info about joining the "Sherrif's Posse".
I can't wait until it's Co. Co.'s turn to get sued!