View Single Post
Old 11-19-2009, 5:41 AM
ilbob ilbob is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,780
iTrader: 0 / 0%

Originally Posted by jnojr View Post
There is no "Second Amendment right to bear arms for hunting" and it's pretty scary that any such language might ever be in any way associated with a higher court ruling.
However, a court has now stated that in addition to a right to own guns for SD there is a right to own guns for hunting. Thats a good thing.

They also seemed to have it right that the core right to SD is what the 2A is about.

They also got it right that there is not really a good enough reason to strip people of their 2A rights solely on the basis of a minor offense that may have occurred many years ago.

I don't see any down side to this.

Disclaimers: I am not a lawyer, cop, soldier, gunsmith, politician, plumber, electrician, or a professional practitioner of many of the other things I comment on in this forum.

Last edited by ilbob; 11-19-2009 at 5:43 AM..
Reply With Quote