View Single Post
Old 03-08-2009, 7:41 AM
BillCA's Avatar
BillCA BillCA is offline
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 3,833
iTrader: 4 / 100%

Originally Posted by FABIO GETS GOOSED!!! View Post
Here's another wager proposal: OAL agrees a legally tenable argument can be made that a Bullet Button equipped, semiautomatic centerfire rifle has the capacity to accept a detachable magazine, notwithstanding APA-compliant, binding 5469(a) and the lawfully configured SKS fixed-magazine rifle.
I think I know where you are going, except I don't think a legitimate argument can be made by your reasoning.

In order for a judgement to be made whether a specific rifle is an "assault weapon" it must be considered as a complete, ready to fire unit. That includes a magazine inserted in the magazine well. When using a properly installed Prince50 or BB, with the magazine inserted, it cannot be removed without the use of tools and no longer has the "capacity to accept" any magazine.

Last edited by BillCA; 03-08-2009 at 8:00 AM..
Reply With Quote