Originally Posted by hoffmang
So far, I haven't spotted any typos in this one...
Not a typo but a usage comment. You write:
Based on the statutory rule of interpretation
expressio unius est exclusio alterius (“the expression
of one thing is the exclusion of another”), the only legally tenable interpretation of the termbe an “unsafe handgun.” This is because none of those sections are referenced in PC §12001(c).
“unsafe handgun” in PC §12125 – PC §12133 is that the frame or receiver of the weapon cannot
You employ this convention of stating code section ranges consistently throughout your petition.
Ranges are normally expressed, e.g., as "§§PC 12125-12133."
Nice job. Keep up the good work.