Originally Posted by elenius
So anyway, why is everyone acting like this is good news? I mean, yeah, it's good that we know about this, but it's not good that they are trying to make things worse for us... is it?
This letter sent to a DA causes the DA to roll his eyes. Trust me, I know. It's just seen as inept. However, manufacturers don't know the law quite so well so I want this
Also, I thought the previous underground regulation (that was fought down?) was about detachable magazines? Can someone clarify?
The previous underground rulemaking was that fixed magazines have to be permanent. You'll note that she goes out of her way to say that temporary magazine fixing is good enough...
Originally Posted by Hunter
Noticed that the letter is dated February 26, 2007..
I count 4 typos <sigh>. I wanted to get this out today because we have some more surprises shortly.
I'm glad someone noticed I gave her two weeks!
Chairman, The Calguns Foundation
to support the rights of California gun owners. Follow @CalgunsFdn
Opinions posted in this account are my own and not the approved position of any organization.
I read PMs. But, if you need a response, include an email address or email me directly!
"The problem with being a gun rights supporter is that the left hates guns and the right hates rights." -Anon