View Single Post
  #8  
Old 02-25-2009, 2:49 PM
rkt88edmo's Avatar
rkt88edmo rkt88edmo is offline
Reptile&Samurai Moderator
CGN Contributor - Lifetime
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Contra Costa County
Posts: 9,538
iTrader: 43 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BamBam-31 View Post
Sorry, in layman's terms, please?
I'm just reading this for the first time but what I see is that the DOJ amply fulfilled the PRA and provided written documentation that supports the CGF claim that DOJ was trying to use "underground regulation" to create policy that was not intended by the legislature.

so
1 - CGF has proof
and
2 - CGF has submitted a petition.

Can someone spell out what petitioning does and what the possible outcomes are?
I'm gathering that if the petition is viewed as correct the DOJ will have to acknowledge that P50/Bullet Button do not violate the law and will have to verify that the current CGF analysis of "detachable"
is correct.
__________________
If it was a snake, it would have bit me.
Use the goog to search calguns

Last edited by rkt88edmo; 02-25-2009 at 2:51 PM..
Reply With Quote