View Single Post
  #7  
Old 04-07-2017, 5:52 AM
Diamondi88 Diamondi88 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Wildomar
Posts: 69
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

I wasn't saying there isn't a conspiracy. My point was between the two cases the number of judges being on both cases does not surprise me when considering the math of just those two cases. But as has been suggested, to advance a conspiracy theory, then if we look at the math we should be able to narrow down to which judges are on all of those cases. Then investigate why that particular judge(s) happens to be on all those cases. That would give proof to a conspiracy.
Reply With Quote