View Single Post
  #39  
Old 11-12-2014, 7:31 PM
hoffmang's Avatar
hoffmang hoffmang is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Peninsula, Bay Area
Posts: 18,447
iTrader: 14 / 100%
Default

I'm 95% confident the window for Sua Sponte is closed. This line from Oscainlain's order basically cements it as there is a set number of days from the release of the opinion that a Sua Sponte call can be made:
Quote:
This order does not extend the time for filing petitions for rehearing for any petitioner who did not move to intervene by February 27, 2014
That means the clock did not stop.

There is also a strong argument that AG Harris does not have standing to ask for review of her denial of intervenor status as she should have asked for that status in the District court and she is not a Party to Peruta.

Now I love that Chuck is trying to claim that the original carry case in the 9th Circuit is somehow bad. Sour grapes that Peruta will not go en banc or see a cert petition often?


Odds of an en banc in Richards - 15%.

Odds of a cert petition by Yolo County in Richards if no en banc - 99%

SCOTUS grant? Who the heck knows at this point.

But the right to carry a firearm in public for self defense will be the law on the west coast until SCOTUS or the en banc court tells us otherwise.

-Gene
__________________
Gene Hoffman
Chairman, The Calguns Foundation

DONATE NOW
to support the rights of California gun owners. Follow @CalgunsFdn on Twitter.
Opinions posted in this account are my own and not the approved position of any organization.
I read PMs. But, if you need a response, include an email address or email me directly!


"The problem with being a gun rights supporter is that the left hates guns and the right hates rights." -Anon