View Single Post
  #25  
Old 05-31-2008, 9:10 PM
Librarian's Avatar
Librarian Librarian is offline
Super Moderator
CGN Contributor - Lifetime
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Concord
Posts: 31,467
iTrader: 4 / 100%
Blog Entries: 6
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Decoligny View Post
Even if they were misreading it as concealable, it still states

(b) Carrying a concealed firearm in violation of this section is punishable, as follows:
...
The critical hurdle here is that the firearm must be concealed to invoke any part of 12025.

Even satisfying 12025(b)(6)(A) and (B), having a concealable weapon not registered to the bearer and also having ammunition for it, means nothing if that weapon were not concealed. Such unconcealed possession is not a crime (without the state Capitol or street gang crime or intent to commit a felony circumstances, all different sections from 12025).
__________________
Calguns Wiki, Magazine Qs, Knife laws

Ask CA law questions in the How CA Laws Apply to/Affect Me Forum - most questions that start 'Is it legal ...' go there.

Not a lawyer, just Some Guy On The Interwebs.

Heller was 2008. McDonald was 2010. Things started getting bad with GCA-1968.
It takes time to unwind 40 years of bad law.
Reply With Quote