Originally Posted by Decoligny
Even if they were misreading it as concealable, it still states
(b) Carrying a concealed firearm in violation of this section is punishable, as follows:
The critical hurdle here is that the firearm must be concealed to invoke any
part of 12025.
Even satisfying 12025(b)(6)(A) and (B), having a concealable weapon not registered to the bearer and also having ammunition for it, means nothing if that weapon were not concealed. Such unconcealed possession is not a crime (without the state Capitol or street gang crime or intent to commit a felony circumstances, all different sections from 12025).
, Magazine Qs
, Knife laws
Unless there is some way to amend a bill so you would support it,
the details do not matter
until the Governor signs or allows the bill to become law.
Ask CA law questions in the How CA Laws Apply to/Affect Me Forum
- most questions that start 'Is it legal ...' go there.
Not a lawyer, just Some Guy On The Interwebs.