View Single Post
  #222  
Old 02-25-2013, 6:11 PM
curtisfong's Avatar
curtisfong curtisfong is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,875
iTrader: 9 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by taperxz View Post
ARE you suggesting we should just take it in the keester and comply?
I'm suggesting we threaten to comply when asked to register thousands (millions?) of firearms as newly minted RAWs.

I can't believe somebody who has been around as long as you is demanding I be explicit about this. Should we really be helping Steinberg fix this legislation before putting it up for a vote?
__________________
The Rifle on the Wall

"“[S]cientific proof” of both gun-rights and gun-control theories “is very hard to get”; therefore, requiring “some substantial scientific proof to show that a [firearm] law will indeed substantially reduce crime and injury” is tantamount to applying strict scrutiny to, and almost certainly will lead to invalidation of, the law." - Kamela Harris

Lawyers and their Stockholm Syndrome

Last edited by curtisfong; 02-25-2013 at 6:14 PM..
Reply With Quote