View Single Post
Old 01-12-2013, 6:39 PM
mrdd mrdd is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: San Francisco Bay
Posts: 1,680
iTrader: 0 / 0%

Originally Posted by kemasa View Post
Change your view, where does the law allow for the CA DOJ to decide to delay the transfer when they don't have any information that you are prohibited. Just because a person was arrested does not mean that they are prohibited. If they were convicted, there would be a record, but it seems that the DOJ is instead demanding proof that they are innocent. An arrest from years ago would have been a conviction OR dropped/not-guilty, it would not be pending.
I understand what you are saying and I agree completely. I think this situation stinks. My point is that the state law is very vague about how the background check is performed. Actually, that is an understatement: the law does not spell out anything about the process. And this is why they are getting away with what they are doing now.
Reply With Quote