View Single Post
Old 01-09-2013, 4:57 PM
putput's Avatar
putput putput is offline
Senior Member
CGN Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Thanks Otis, Thanks Alan!
Posts: 767
iTrader: 11 / 100%

And you got your clients their gun shows back. With guns. Nice work and thanks.

Originally Posted by Lex Arma View Post
Just like the County, you are cherry picking facts. The JOINT STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS for the summary judgment stipulated that County Counsel (Richard Winnie) was the only Alameda official authorized to interpret the ordinance. His interpretation in 1999 (after the amendment for secured guns), which has never been modified, was that no guns could be present at gun shows held at the fairgrounds.

That is a completely different set of facts from the Court holding a party to an interpretation of the law made by outside counsel in the Court of Appeals after the close of evidence.

This is simple, the Ninth Circuit hated this case. The County gave them an excuse to shut it down and they took it.
"America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards."
- Claire Wolfe

Reply With Quote