is a link to the full opinion.
The rationale of the opinion is based on a pure technical interpretation of the statutory language and ignores the reality of game crime. Not all is lost since the Court points out that 188.22(b)(1) enhancement can still apply to the lone actor but that might be a little more difficult to prove than the substantive 186.22(a)(1) count. The enhancement carries more time at 2-3-4 versus 16-2-3.
Good gang packets and good gang experts will carry the day.