Calguns.net

Calguns.net (http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/index.php)
-   California 2nd Amend. Political Discussion & Activism (http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/forumdisplay.php?f=71)
-   -   2013 CA SB 374 - VETOED OCT 11 -Steinberg - Firearms: assault weapons (http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/showthread.php?t=708722)

Markinsac 02-20-2013 11:20 PM

2013 CA SB 374 - VETOED OCT 11 -Steinberg - Firearms: assault weapons
 
5/29/2013 - passed Senate 23-15, sent to the Assembly.

--
Defines any semiautomatic, rimfire, or centerfire rifle that does not have a fixed and the capacity to accept 10 rounds or fewer as an assault weapon.

http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/fa...arch_keywords=

Quote:

SB 374, as introduced, Steinberg. Firearms: assault weapons.
Existing law regulates the sale, carrying, and control of firearms, including assault weapons, and requires assault weapons to be registered with the Department of Justice. Violation of these provisions is a crime. Existing law defines a semiautomatic, centerfire rifle that has the capacity to accept a detachable magazine and other specified features and a semiautomatic weapon that has a fixed magazine with a capacity to accept 10 or more rounds as an assault weapon.
This bill would, instead, classify a semiautomatic, rimfire or centerfire rifle that does not have a fixed magazine with the capacity to accept 10 rounds or fewer as an assault weapon. The bill would require a person who, between January 1, 2001, and prior to January 1, 2014, lawfully possessed an assault weapon that does not have a fixed magazine, including those weapons with an ammunition feeding device that can be removed readily from the firearm with the use of a tool, to register the firearm by July 1, 2014. By expanding the definition of a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
This bill would require, on and after July 1, 2014, a Firearm Ownership Record to be submitted, as specified, to the Department of Justice for every firearm an individual owns, with prescribed exceptions, including firearms purchased from a licensed firearms dealer and documented by a Dealers’ Record of Sale transaction and assault weapons registered with the department. The bill would authorize the department to charge a fee of up to $19 per transaction for the submission of the Firearm Ownership Record.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

curtisfong 02-20-2013 11:25 PM

time to buy a dozen 80%'s, finish them, and register them all as AWs.

IPSICK 02-20-2013 11:28 PM

Do these people and their staffers even proofread the bills they submit?

MattyB 02-20-2013 11:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by curtisfong (Post 10599007)
time to buy a dozen 80%'s, finish them, and register them all as AWs.

Why 80% lowers? This will ban everything from AKs and ARs to 10/22s as assault weapons.

Negating the law by refusal is better that complying when the law is this broad. Any semi-rifle that accepts a magazine will be labeled this way and as such will be subject to the laws and regulations of RAWs that are owned by people now.

Its unreasonable and unethical for any 2A supporter to comply with this law if it is passed.

MalikCarr 02-20-2013 11:33 PM

I was going to make some chuckle about the M1 Carbine being an assault weapon, but then I found an even better victim.

If I've read Steinberg's bill correctly, the MARLIN MODEL 60 would be an assault weapon. Christ.

http://www.marlinfirearms.com/images/zoom_60.jpg <- I kill babies and shoot through schools.

Sometimes a man wonders...

curtisfong 02-20-2013 11:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MattyB (Post 10599043)
Why 80% lowers?

Because they can have any serial number I want on them...

DannyInSoCal 02-20-2013 11:52 PM

Simply engrave 80% lowers with:

Custom Built On July 4th, 1976
Bicentennial Edition - #925 of 1000

Librarian 02-20-2013 11:57 PM

I was wondering when the penny would drop ...

And this is good -
Quote:

This bill would require, on and after July 1, 2014, a Firearm Ownership Record to be submitted, as specified, to the Department of Justice for every firearm an individual owns, with prescribed exceptions, including firearms purchased from a licensed firearms dealer and documented by a Dealers’ Record of Sale transaction and assault weapons registered with the department. The bill would authorize the department to charge a fee of up to $19 per transaction for the submission of the Firearm Ownership Record.
Register every gun you have.

DonFerrando 02-21-2013 12:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Librarian (Post 10599177)
I was wondering when the penny would drop ...

And this is good - Register every gun you have.

It is?

StuckInTheP.R.O.Ca 02-21-2013 12:15 AM

I am so fed up with the insanity of this state!

hoffmang 02-21-2013 12:18 AM

Briar Patch!

-Gene

curtisfong 02-21-2013 12:20 AM

The mother of all briar patches.

Thanks, Steinberg!

curtisfong 02-21-2013 12:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DannyInSoCal (Post 10599156)
Simply engrave 80% lowers with:

Custom Built On July 4th, 1976
Bicentennial Edition - #925 of 1000

Naw. They'll be engraved with 1-1000.

And ill register all 1000 of them.

0nTarg3t 02-21-2013 12:25 AM

is it 19 bucks per gun or Firearm Ownership Record? that could be very expensive,and a very convenient list for the next phase of there plan: Confiscation .

curtisfong 02-21-2013 12:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 0nTarg3t (Post 10599304)
is it 19 bucks per gun or Firearm Ownership Record? that could be very expensive,and a very convenient list for the next phase of there plan: Confiscation .

Where plan?

Again, briar patch.

You aren't thinking creatively enough. I'll shut up now. No need to help Steinberg put lipstick on this already very pretty pig.

mag360 02-21-2013 12:31 AM

With the pro tem carrying it. They are serious.

Foreman 02-21-2013 12:33 AM

They've always been serious. Now they're cocky, too.

Vlad 11 02-21-2013 12:37 AM

Outrageous!

http://i.imgur.com/kf3IURi.jpg

IPSICK 02-21-2013 12:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hoffmang (Post 10599272)
Briar Patch!

-Gene

Is that where I register and turn in all my guns that I lost in the boating accident?

lilro 02-21-2013 1:06 AM

I'll have a Briar supreme with cheese, please.

stix213 02-21-2013 1:41 AM

This becoming law could be the best thing that has ever happened to us.

Ford8N 02-21-2013 4:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by curtisfong (Post 10599071)
Because they can have any serial number I want on them...

I like the way you think... :devil:

Quote:

Originally Posted by stix213 (Post 10599529)
This becoming law could be the best thing that has ever happened to us.

THIS*WOULD*BE*AWESOME!

:jump:

now...silence.

killmime1234 02-21-2013 4:54 AM

Why an obscure number like $19? I have to imagine it comes from the billwriter's sales pitch to raise the state X number of dollars. X divided by "projected number of firearms in CA to be registered" equals 19.

seabee1 02-21-2013 5:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stix213 (Post 10599529)
This becoming law could be the best thing that has ever happened to us.

In what way?

tuolumnejim 02-21-2013 5:02 AM

Lol this makes my Marlin Model 60 an AW since it holds seventeen rounds. :facepalm:

joe_sun 02-21-2013 5:07 AM

I can't even get worked up over this.

Bring it on

SanPedroShooter 02-21-2013 5:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tuolumnejim (Post 10599828)
Lol this makes my Marlin Model 60 an AW since it holds seventeen rounds. :facepalm:

Isnt the Marlin 60 okay cause the magazines is fixed? Or am I reading that wrong. Neverming fixed and capacity to accept.

It doesnt matter to me anyway, I will turn in nothing and register nothing.

These laws are only as good as the people that enforce them and obey them.

Think of all the felons! Think of all the prisons we'll need to build, the taxpayers we'll need to arrest, round up and confine! It makes the mind boggle....

tuolumnejim 02-21-2013 5:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SanPedroShooter (Post 10599852)
Isnt the Marlin 60 okay cause the magazines is fixed? Or am I reading that wrong.

It doesnt matter to me anyway, I will turn in nothing or register nothing.

These laws are only as good as the people that enforce them and obey them.

Looks to me like it has to have a total capacity of 10 or fewer rounds.

Quote:

classify a semiautomatic, rimfire or centerfire rifle that does not have a fixed magazine with the capacity to accept 10 rounds or fewer as an assault weapon.

SanPedroShooter 02-21-2013 5:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tuolumnejim (Post 10599862)
Looks to me like it has to have a total capacity of 10 or fewer rounds.

Yeah, I went back and changed my post to refect that.

I have a model 60... I mean 'assault weapon' sorry.

Gives a man something to think about.

sandman21 02-21-2013 5:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by curtisfong (Post 10599311)
Where plan?

Again, briar patch.

You aren't thinking creatively enough. I'll shut up now. No need to help Steinberg put lipstick on this already very pretty pig.

Have this enact at the end of this year have Bontia(sp) bill start some time after which eliminates grandfather clauses. You now have a record of all firearms that can be seized.

rodeoflyer 02-21-2013 5:40 AM

How does Yee find the time to write all this garbage and still have time to *allegedly* troll for prostitutes at night? Does he ever sleep?

seabee1 02-21-2013 5:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rodeoflyer (Post 10599923)
How does Yee find the time to write all this garbage and still have time to *allegedly* troll for prostitutes at night? Does he ever sleep?

He has high energy from his shark fin soup

tenpercentfirearms 02-21-2013 5:44 AM

Let's get serious here. We need to fight this. If you are not a member of the NRA and SAF, you need to join now.

http://membership.nrahq.org/

http://www.saf.org/default.asp?p=safdonation

If you haven't donated to the Calguns Foundation, you should think about doing so.

http://www.calgunsfoundation.org/

Do you shop at Amazon? Just go to Amazon at www.shop42a.com and automatically a portion of your purchase goes to the Calguns Foundation and it doesn't cost you a dime!

It is important that no matter how you feel about the NRA, they need the numbers so they can say they represent voters and that is a powerful thing.

And next, lets end the whole registration leads to confiscation hysteria and the absolutely absurdity that you lost your guns in a boating accident. If you are not 100% committed to the fact that if they come door to door for our guns, that this time has not come then I suggest you sell all of your guns now and join the liberals today so you can continue to live comfortably in bondage never having soiled yourself standing next to those patriots that will.

If they come for your guns, it is time to use them. We still have a fight left in the legislature. We still have a fight left in the courts. If they succeed, do not comply, but prepare for your chance to finally walk the walk and fight for your freedom. Make no mistake about it, if they come for your guns, anyone advocating hiding is not on the side of liberty and definitely not fulfilling their duty to establish a new government.

I am not a radical, I am history teacher. Read that link to the Declaration of Independence above. This concept is as old as John Locke and the foundation of our nation. I think some of you need to remember that and you most certainly ought to start telling your friends about it.

Let's fight them in the legislature so we don't have to fight them later. Get to it.

pdugan6 02-21-2013 5:44 AM

my contempt for these people grows every day>>>>>

Renaissance Redneck 02-21-2013 6:26 AM

Some language and punctuation in this bill was either inadvertently, or perhaps purposefully, confusing. On first glance, it appears to affect only semiautomatic rifles, whether they be rimfire or centerfire (lovely; my 10-22 is an "assault weapon". HAH!!!). Read it again....

"This bill would, instead, classify a semiautomatic, rimfire or centerfire rifle that does not have a fixed magazine . . . . "

Read a different way, the bill would apply to semiautomatics AND rimfires AND centerfires that do not have fixed magazines. In other words, any firearm with a detachable magazine, regardless of type of action, is an assault weapon.

Hey, you hunters who don't care about this because you can still have your unregistered bolt actions; take notice. The language in the bill classifies your bolt action rifle with a detachable magazine as an assault weapon.

Just saying.

compulsivegunbuyer 02-21-2013 6:29 AM

The intent is clear. The majority of people are not going to even know this exists, compliance will be low, just like the last ban. From then on, any unregistered gun gets taken.

seabee1 02-21-2013 6:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tenpercentfirearms (Post 10599933)
Let's fight them in the legislature so we don't have to fight them later. Get to it.

Donated to Calguns Foundation

pMcW 02-21-2013 6:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rodeoflyer (Post 10599923)
How does Yee find the time to write all this garbage and still have time to *allegedly* troll for prostitutes at night? Does he ever sleep?

Steinberg supposedly wrote this one...

http://extras.mnginteractive.com/liv...re%205_200.png

SanPedroShooter 02-21-2013 6:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Renaissance Redneck (Post 10600126)
Some language and punctuation in this bill was either inadvertently, or perhaps purposefully, confusing. On first glance, it appears to affect only semiautomatic rifles, whether they be rimfire or centerfire (lovely; my 10-22 is an "assault weapon". HAH!!!). Read it again....

"This bill would, instead, classify a semiautomatic, rimfire or centerfire rifle that does not have a fixed magazine . . . . "

Read a different way, the bill would apply to semiautomatics AND rimfires AND centerfires that do not have fixed magazines. In other words, any firearm with a detachable magazine, regardless of type of action, is an assault weapon.

Hey, you hunters who don't care about this because you can still have your unregistered bolt actions; take notice. The language in the bill classifies your bolt action rifle with a detachable magazine as an assault weapon.

Just saying.

I noticed that too.

I wasnt sure what to make of it.

cdtx2001 02-21-2013 6:58 AM

Goodbye M1 Garand


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 9:55 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.