Perata "takes out his frustrations at the range"

[Anthonysmanifesto]

article on Peratas history with firearms on Capitol Alert (http://www.sacbee.com/780/), which everyone should be signed up for.

http://www.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/capitolalertlatest/008888.html

this article was written just a few months ago and sheds some light on his firearms practices

November 05, 2007
Click here to find out more!
'I can put six in a torso at 15 feet'

It's no secret that Senate President Pro Tem Don Perata has a history of packing heat. But is he any good?

"I'll never be a Green Beret, but I can put six in a torso at 15 feet," wrote the Oakland Democrat in a 2006 license renewal letter reminiscent of a Sam Spade soliloquy.

See Perata's letter for yourself here. (http://www.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/capitolalertlatest/LETTER.jpg)

Perata may have let the license expire, but he says he's still got aim. "I've been taking my frustrations out" at the range," the senator said Monday.

For years, Perata has held a license to carry a concealed weapon issued by the Alameda County Sheriff. In a 1999 application letter, Perata stated that his public policy efforts fighting assault weapons have angered individuals "who have made overt threats on my life and the well-being of my family."

According to the senator's latest renewal letter dated Dec. 27, 2006, Perata returned to carrying a .38 Colt revolver because "it is the least conspicuous." The letter was obtained from the Sheriff's Department under a Public Records Act request.

Perata had been planning to let his license expire but had a change of heart after launching an anti-gang initiative in his Oakland district.

"I hadn't intended to renew, but my latest activities in the 'hoods have caused me to rethink my position," the senator wrote to outgoing Sheriff Charles Plummer. Gregory Ahern is now Alameda's sheriff.

Generally, concealed weapon licenses are rare. Applicants must show they are of good moral character and need protection. They also must pass a firearms proficiency test.

Perata wrote that he has kept up his firing skills at a friend's 10-acre spread in Grass Valley.

Two days after Perata wrote his letter, Plummer reissued his license for two years on condition that he pass a range test. Perata said he never took that test, allowing the license to lapse.

"If something happens again, I'll rethink it," Perata said.
Posted by Judy Lin on November 5, 2007 03:45 PM

[SemiAutoSam]

Gee maybe if he didn't infringe on the rights of the Citizens of the Corporate State they wouldn't threaten him.

I would expect to be threatened if I attempted to take the rights away from people.

Not that I'm suggesting such a thing as I'm sure that would be not only illegal but against board rules but if politicians that violated our constitutional rights were removed from office in this manner I have a feeling that the others left in office wouldn't tread on our constitutional rights.

That is if they were smart enough to see outside of their little world and understand why Joe Politician was removed not that this would be the case.

For years, Perata has held a license to carry a concealed weapon issued by the Alameda County Sheriff. In a 1999 application letter, Perata stated that his public policy efforts fighting assault weapons have angered individuals "who have made overt threats on my life and the well-being of my family."

[rksimple]

I would expect to be threatened if I attempted to take the rights away from people.



I wish they all understood this.

[ldivinag]

how racist...

"my activities in the 'hood"...

[RDG]

I thought they always said self defense was not a valid reason for a CCW. Looks like it was good enough for Don the Dipstick.
Bob

[Patriot]

Some animals are more equal than others :mad:

[RRangel]

Apparently self defense is good enough for him, but not for us. Typical elitist hypocrite.

[kermit315]

what is to stop somebody from using the same good cause statement he did, and when they get denied, sue under 14th amendment? self defense is self defense, right.

[ldivinag]

i think i'll apply:

reason? my activities in the 'hood...


think that will fly?

[Ironchef]

how racist...

"my activities in the 'hood"...

Actually, that's more "elitist" or "class bigot," not racist. Wouldn't doubt he's racist though judging his speech.

[Soldier415]

i think i'll apply:

reason? my activities in the 'hood...


think that will fly?


Depends. Are you bling-blinging on dubs like its christmas time?

[RAD-CDPII]

Gotta love it: "I'll never be a Green Beret, but I can put six in a torso at 15 feet," wrote the Oakland Democrat in a 2006 license renewal letter reminiscent of a Sam Spade soliloquy.

Most of us could probably do that with our eyes closed at 15 feet.

[JohnJW]

Generally, concealed weapon licenses are rare. Applicants must show they are of good moral character and need protection. They also must pass a firearms proficiency test.

Of Good Moral Character? Disregarding the FBI investigation and raid on his house, the fact that he wants to disarm the masses while asking for a CCW to protect himself should be a disqualifying factor for Parata.

[dfletcher]

Do you recall the private Schwartzenegger tapes last year in which he referred to Perata as "sick". I never got the feeling he was talking about his health and Perata's tepid response along the lines of "gee I feel fine" make me think that even more so. Just a gut feeling, but I think there's something quite out of whack with the fellow - he probably deviates from the norm in some interesting ways.

[Paladin]

For years, Perata has held a license to carry a concealed weapon issued by the Alameda County Sheriff. In a 1999 application letter, Perata stated that his public policy efforts fighting assault weapons have angered individuals "who have made overt threats on my life and the well-being of my family."
I am totally against threating the life of any public official, regardless of their position on the 2nd A RKBA.

Now, if you were to ask me whether a politician who is actively undermining our RKBA should be tarred and feathered, well, I'd just have to think about that for awhile. ;)

[M. Sage]

Gotta love it: "I'll never be a Green Beret, but I can put six in a torso at 15 feet," wrote the Oakland Democrat in a 2006 license renewal letter reminiscent of a Sam Spade soliloquy.

Most of us could probably do that with our eyes closed at 15 feet.

ROFL, no kidding. 15 feet? You better be able to keep 6/6 (he doesn't say out of how many! It's probably 6/15...) in a pretty tight group at 5 yards.

[hoffmang]

I miss tarring and feathering...

-Gene

[Dont Tread on Me]

How did such a bag of dog poop become so powerful in CA?

[InvictusManeo]

I am totally against threating the life of any public official, regardless of their position on the 2nd A RKBA.


The bible takes a strong stance on killing. It is, however, somewhat fuzzy on the subject of kneecaps.

If you recognized that quote, you are a true nerd. We should hang out.:p

[jdberger]

I miss tarring and feathering...

-Gene

and "riding out on a rail"....

[Patriot]

The bible takes a strong stance on killing. It is, however, somewhat fuzzy on the subject of kneecaps.

If you recognized that quote, you are a true nerd. We should hang out.:p

Someone ever tries to kill you...you try kill em right back :D

[paradox]

and "riding out on a rail"....

A rough hewn rail at that. And if we can use a creosote soaked rail it would be even better :43:

[Dont Tread on Me]

The bible takes a strong stance on killing.

I think the Bible is referring to murder not killing. I to am against any threat on an elected official.

[GW]

The bible takes a strong stance on killing. It is, however, somewhat fuzzy on the subject of kneecaps
Yes, Shepherd.:D

[SFFRONTMAN]

....im talking at you!

[DedEye]

I think the Bible is referring to murder not killing. I to am against any threat on an elected official.

He was quoting Firefly...

[Sutcliffe]

And I don't condone or practice threatening public officials myself but,
isn't the whole idea behind the 2nd ammendment to provide enough of a threat to keep them honest(obviously we are failing at that)?

[Paladin]

And I don't condone or practice threatening public officials myself but,
isn't the whole idea behind the 2nd ammendment to provide enough of a threat to keep them honest(obviously we are failing at that)?Could the prohibition of a standing army be the other side of the same coin?

Wikipedia has some thought provoking quotes on this idea at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution #Origin

[johnny_22]

Maybe it was 15 yards, which is tougher, but, still doable. He should join a league and practice out to 25 yards. That is more of a challenge (for me at least).

[BG383579mm]

Perata is another example of imbalance. Everyone needs self-protection.
"Because when seconds count, the police are only minutes away.”
Sadly, he's been ensconced for years.......

[SchooBaka]

Some animals are more equal than others :mad:

+1!
If anyone has'nt seen or read animal farm, they should. Look at when it was written, then look at what we have today.

[DesertGunner]

Six in the torso at 15 feet?

I should hope most people capable of walking upright and breathing on their own would be able to manage that feet of marksmanship.

[yellowfin]

I think the Bible is referring to murder not killing. I to am against any threat on an elected official. I'm sure those that need to be threatened are against it too.