View Full Version : Schoepf v. Harris (DROS delays)

08-22-2013, 10:04 PM
Schoepf v. Harris
Issue: Petition alleges that Cal. DOJ's policy of issuing DROS delay letters is unlawful; delays are only authorized by PC 28220(e) for non-payment of DROS fees or if purchaser cannot be identified due to incomplete/incorrect info on the DROS application, and may delay only until correct application info/fees are submitted.

Current Status:
As of 3/24/2014 - Case complete.

11/12/2013 - Judgment entered for Defendants.
10/23/2013 - Writ Denied as Moot (given passage of AB 500 (http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/13-14/bill/asm/ab_0451-0500/ab_500_cfa_20130909_220231_asm_floor.html)) {good call, Tincon}.
9/24/2013 - Hearing continued to 10/23/2013.
8/1/2013 - Hearing continued to 9/24/2013 at 8:30am, Dept 51.
5/13/2013 - Answer filed.
4/11/2013 - Petition (http://www.calgunsfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/cgf_dros-delay-complaint.pdf) for Writ of Mandate filed & served.

Trial Court: Cal. Super. Ct. - Fresno
Case No.: 13CECG01132
Docket: http://banweb.co.fresno.ca.us/cprodsnp/ck_public_qry_doct.cp_dktrpt_setup_idx
(enter Case No.)

Wildhawker's thread: http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/showthread.php?t=656150
PC 28220: http://law.onecle.com/california/penal/28220.html
CGF Wiki for this case: (none)
CGF Wiki Litigation page: http://wiki.calgunsfoundation.org/Litigation_Past_and_Present

08-22-2013, 10:12 PM
This case may be rendered moot by AB 500.

big jim
09-05-2013, 8:13 PM
I'm not liking the wording in that of 1 firearm in 30 days.

09-17-2013, 1:26 AM
Any updates? I was delayed and haven't tried since. 15% restocking fees are hard to eat if I randomly get delayed again..