PDA

View Full Version : US Attorney General Gonzales Resigns


Outlaw Josey Wales
08-27-2007, 4:03 PM
US Attorney General Gonzales Resigns
By MATT APUZZO, Associated Press Writer

Monday, August 27, 2007


(08-27) 14:28 PDT WASHINGTON, (AP) --


Alberto Gonzales, the nation's first Hispanic attorney general, announced his resignation Monday, driven from office after a wrenching standoff with congressional critics over his honesty and competence.


Republicans and Democrats alike had demanded his departure over the botched handling of FBI terror investigations and the firings of U.S. attorneys, but President Bush had defiantly stood by his Texas friend for months until accepting his resignation last Friday.


"After months of unfair treatment that has created a harmful distraction at the Justice Department, Judge Gonzales decided to resign his position and I accept his decision," Bush said from Texas, where he is vacationing.


Solicitor General Paul Clement will be acting attorney general until a replacement is found and confirmed by the Senate, Bush said.


Homeland Security chief Michael Chertoff was among those mentioned as possible successors, though a senior administration official said the matter had not been raised with Chertoff. Bush leaves Washington next Monday for Australia, and Gonzales' replacement might not be named by then, the official said.


"It has been one of my greatest privileges to lead the Department of Justice," Gonzales said, announcing his resignation effective Sept. 17 in a terse statement. He took no questions and gave no reason for stepping down.


Bush said the attorney general's "good name was dragged through the mud for political reasons." Though some Republicans echoed the president's veiled slap at Democrats, Gonzales had few defenders left in Washington.


Many Republicans actually welcomed his departure, some quietly and others publicly so.


Congressional aides and lawmakers agreed that any nomination of a new attorney general was almost certain to be acrimonious. The easiest prospects, some said, might be a current or former colleague of senators charged with the confirmation. Sen. Arlen Specter, the ranking Republican on the Judiciary Committee, told reporters Monday that he would not accept the job, if offered.


But, he said, another current or former senator "might be just the ticket."


"If you have a former senator or a present senator or somebody who is well known to the Senate or the committee...that's always a big help if you know the person," Specter told reporters in a telephone call as he traveled from Warsaw to Paris.


Asked, too, about whether Chertoff might be a good candidate, Specter replied:


"I think he's a first-rate prospect."


Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards applauded Gonzales' resignation, saying it was "better late than never."


The announcement came as a surprise to many in the administration. Gonzales was tight-lipped about his thinking before going on vacation more than a week ago and aides were planning events for the next several months.


After spending time with his family in Texas, however, and facing the prospect of returning to Washington for months of continued fights with Congress, he called the president on Friday.


The White House has asked anyone staying past Labor Day to stay the remainder of the president's term.


Gonzales, formerly Bush's White House counsel, served more than two years at the Justice Department. In announcing his decision, Gonzales reflected on his up-from-the-bootstraps life story; he's the son of migrant farm workers from Mexico who didn't finish elementary school.


"Even my worst days as attorney general have been better than my father's best days," Gonzales said.


Bush steadfastly and at times angrily refused to give in to critics, even from his own GOP, who argued that Gonzales should go.


Earlier this month at a news conference, the president grew irritated when asked about accountability in his administration and turned the tables on the Democratic Congress.


"Implicit in your questions is that Al Gonzales did something wrong. I haven't seen Congress say he's done anything wrong," Bush said testily at the time. Actually, many in Congress had accused Gonzales of wrongdoing.


After the 52-year-old Gonzales called Bush Friday, the president had him come to lunch at his ranch on Sunday as a parting gesture, a senior administration official said.


Gonzales, whom Bush once considered for appointment to the Supreme Court, is the fourth top-ranking administration official to leave since November 2006, following Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, who had a high-ranking Pentagon job before going to the World Bank as its president, and top political and policy adviser Karl Rove.


Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., reacted to the announcement by saying the Justice Department under Gonzales had "suffered a severe crisis of leadership that allowed our justice system to be corrupted by political influence."


As attorney general and earlier as White House counsel, Gonzales pushed for expanded presidential powers, including the eavesdropping authority. He drafted controversial rules for military war tribunals and sought to limit the legal rights of detainees at Guantanamo Bay prompting lawsuits by civil libertarians who said the government was violating the Constitution in its pursuit of terrorists.


"Alberto Gonzales was never the right man for this job. He lacked independence, he lacked judgment, and he lacked the spine to say no to Karl Rove," said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev.


In a warning to the White House, Reid suggested that investigations into the Justice Department will not end until Congress gets "to the bottom of this mess."


One matter still under investigation is the 2006 dismissal of several federal prosecutors, who serve at the president's pleasure. Lawmakers said the action appeared to be politically motivated, and some of the fired U.S. attorneys said they felt pressured to investigate Democrats before elections.


Gonzales maintained that the dismissals were based the prosecutors' lackluster performance records.


In April, Gonzales answered "I don't know" and "I can't recall" scores of times while questioned by Congress about the firings. Even some Republicans said his testimony was evasive.


Not Bush. The president praised Gonzales' performance and said the attorney general was "honest" and "honorable."


In 2004, Gonzales pressed to reauthorize a secret domestic spying program over the Justice Department's protests. Gonzales was White House counsel at the time and during a dramatic hospital confrontation he and then-White House chief of staff Andrew Card sought approval from then-Attorney General John Ashcroft, who was in intensive care recovering from surgery. Ashcroft refused.


Similarly, Gonzales found himself on the defensive as recently as March because of the FBI's improper and, in some cases, illegal prying into Americans' personal information during terror and spy probes.


___


AP White House Correspondent Terence Hunt and Associated Press reporters Jennifer Loven and Lara Jakes Jordan contributed to this story.

http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2007/08/27/national/w073825D97.DTL

MrTuffPaws
08-27-2007, 4:29 PM
I really don't know how he did it, but Gonzales made me miss Ashcroft.

RRangel
08-27-2007, 4:31 PM
I really don't know how he did it, but Gonzales made me miss Ashcroft.

A lot of mudslinging from Democrats.

DedEye
08-27-2007, 6:10 PM
Hurrah!!!! Another one bites the dust.

JohnJW
08-27-2007, 6:22 PM
A lot of mudslinging from Democrats.


I don't think so. I thought electing GW Bush, Cheney, Rumsfield, and rest of the neocons means more personal freedom, smaller government, and not capitulation to dictators of the world. . . . The opposite of the Clinton administration.

7 years later I feel cheated. We got domestic wiretapping, extraordinary rendition, and torture. Government is everywhere now, in the office, in the living room, and in the bedroom. We don't capitulate to the dictators of the world because we slowly becoming one. What a mess. . . .

Like MrTuffPaws, I didn't like Ashcroft till Gonzales came along. At least Ashcroft had the balls to stand up to the president when he thinks the president has gone too far.

socalguns
08-27-2007, 8:55 PM
he's not dead

MrTuffPaws
08-27-2007, 11:11 PM
I don't think so. I thought electing GW Bush, Cheney, Rumsfield, and rest of the neocons means more personal freedom, smaller government, and not capitulation to dictators of the world. . . . The opposite of the Clinton administration.

7 years later I feel cheated. We got domestic wiretapping, extraordinary rendition, and torture. Government is everywhere now, in the office, in the living room, and in the bedroom. We don't capitulate to the dictators of the world because we slowly becoming one. What a mess. . . .

Like MrTuffPaws, I didn't like Ashcroft till Gonzales came along. At least Ashcroft had the balls to stand up to the president when he thinks the president has gone too far.

Not to mention Gonzales' collective right interpretation of the 2nd.

jerryg1776
08-27-2007, 11:18 PM
Fred Thompson for AG... hahahahahhahahahahhahahhahahah

I can see it coming.

WolfMansDad
08-28-2007, 10:44 AM
I thought electing GW Bush, Cheney, Rumsfield, and rest of the neocons means more personal freedom, smaller government, and not capitulation to dictators of the world. . . . The opposite of the Clinton administration.

7 years later I feel cheated. We got domestic wiretapping, extraordinary rendition, and torture. Government is everywhere now, in the office, in the living room, and in the bedroom. We don't capitulate to the dictators of the world because we slowly becoming one. What a mess. . . .


I couldn't have said it better myself.

All these years, I've made fun of my Democrat friends for having the wool pulled over their eyes, for being lied to and used by their party, and now I get the same thing done to me.

Gonzales was Darth Vader as Attorney General. Good riddance.

lawnrevenge
08-28-2007, 10:59 AM
I was very happy to see this go down yesterday. Got in a wonderful arguement with my mother about it. Seems that to her if the gov't taps phones and stops "terrorism*" then it's worth it. She didn't like that I pointed out that wire taping without a warrant gives the gov't too much power and it violates our rights. She didn't even grasp the idea that you shouldn't trade freedom for "security". It was very fun to see how she (a Bush empathizer because "he prays" and "he's doing his best" and we haven't been attacked since 9/11) will gladly drink the kool-aid and think that the Bush Admin. can do no wrong. Now she thinks the Romney is the way to go. It is just amazing how sometimes people will turn off their reasoning ability to justify their political convictions.

lawnrevenge
08-28-2007, 11:43 AM
I wonder how many white democrats will vote for obama due to "the white man's burden"? You know good old fassion "white guilt". Just as many "demo-men" will vote for Hillary to prove they aren't sexist. It's all about being PC. Too bad people won't just vote for the person that will uphold the constitution. Of course the man with the best hair tends to win (no joke)

ccwguy
08-28-2007, 4:07 PM
I wonder how many white democrats will vote for obama due to "the white man's burden"? You know good old fassion "white guilt". Just as many "demo-men" will vote for Hillary to prove they aren't sexist. It's all about being PC. Too bad people won't just vote for the person that will uphold the constitution. Of course the man with the best hair tends to win (no joke)

'Fred' has great hair, I figure!!

DedEye
08-28-2007, 7:00 PM
I wonder how many white democrats will vote for obama due to "the white man's burden"? You know good old fassion "white guilt". Just as many "demo-men" will vote for Hillary to prove they aren't sexist. It's all about being PC. Too bad people won't just vote for the person that will uphold the constitution. Of course the man with the best hair tends to win (no joke)

I'm voting for Bill Richardson in the primary because I think he'd do a better job as president than Obama. If Obama wins the primary I'd vote for him, unless he was running against McCain or Ron Paul, in which case I'd vote for them.

lawnrevenge
08-28-2007, 9:45 PM
I'm not sure who has better hair, Edwards or Romney???
I frankly don't know who/what I'll be voting for yet. It's sad when all the choices are so very uninspiring! Voting for Obama will just be helping us get a new AWB...of course you could say that about most choices.

adamsreeftank
08-28-2007, 10:11 PM
I'm voting for either the Richardson/Paul or the Paul/Richardson ticket. Other than that, I'll take a pass.

And yeah, good riddance to Gonzalez. Every time I think the administration can't screw up worse than the last guy, they prove me wrong.

Osprey
08-29-2007, 12:48 AM
I wonder how many white democrats will vote for obama due to "the white man's burden"?

Fewer than the polls suggest. Bradley effect, dude.