PDA

View Full Version : IS THIS OBAMAS REAL AGENDA


TeddyBallgame
01-08-2013, 8:26 AM
is this something he wants?

to go down in history as the President that blatantly committed an act of treason, by enacting laws, which assisted to the taking away our 2nd Amendment right?

is this a part of his legacy that he really wants attached to his name, many years down the road, when, history starts its biographical coverage of him...time has a way of revealing all the rights, and, wrongs during the incumbency of a President...does he want to be saddled with the long term consequences such a decision could attach to his name?

im not sure yet...Obama, like any other politician, is not above looking people in the eye, while at the same time, knowing what he is telling them may never happen...I'm not sure if he has any loyalty, even to his own flock, and, for that reason, he is a tough read on just how hard or soft of a stance he is really going to take with his promise to do something about better gun control...when you think about it, he has never given any kind of an indication of his thoughts or plans concerning gun control...at least, not that I remember

what do you think? is Obama going to take the big leap, or, just throw out a few shallow restrictions that won't have a major impact on our 2A rights?

Moonshine
01-08-2013, 8:28 AM
Actually if you haven't noticed Obama has ready banned guns by creating so much panic you can't buy a gun because there are none left to buy :)!

ChrisC
01-08-2013, 8:30 AM
How about we wait and see what he tries to do. He has not done anything yet to take away our gun rights. And in fact, he has received an F from the Brady Group with his gun policies which he has introduced none.

JackRydden224
01-08-2013, 8:33 AM
Actually if you haven't noticed Obama has ready banned guns by creating so much panic you can't buy a gun because there are none left to buy :)!

LOL good one!

How about we wait and see what he tries to do. He has not done anything yet to take away our gun rights. And in fact, he has received an F from the Brady Group with his gun policies which he has introduced none.

He cannot run for POTUS again but people in his party wants to be reelected in the next election. The last time Clinton imposed a AWB the Dems lost a lot of seats. If there is anything we know for certain about them politician is that they are out for themselves.

The only people immune to it are people like DiFi who will get reelected no matter what.

Clownpuncher
01-08-2013, 8:34 AM
I agree with ChrisC let's see what he gets away with.

But, in all honesty, I don't think he cares. He's the first black president and, like it or not, that is what he will be remembered for. And possibly Healthcare.

CHIEFone
01-08-2013, 8:38 AM
But, in all honesty, I don't think he cares. He's the first black president and, like it or not, that is what he will be remembered for. And possibly Healthcare.

^^^ THIS

pitbull30
01-08-2013, 8:44 AM
I dont think he cares. Besides hes on his second term. He doesnt have to win another election.

Heard on the radio this a.m

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2013/01/biden-ramps-up-meetings-with-groups-about-gun-violence/

Id like to know what groups are meeting here to support us. Anyone know?

VW*Mike
01-08-2013, 8:46 AM
Yeah, he wont be remembered for drones, detention of citizens, egypt, or any other horribly bad thing, all history will support him as is the first black president. That's it. Obamacars true colors are coming out and it will not be looked upon favorably in the coming years, so that's it. He is a political zealot and I wouldn't put it past him to ram whatever he, or his party wants through in the next 4 years.

border.bandito
01-08-2013, 8:47 AM
He's the first black president and, like it or not, that is what he will be remembered for. And possibly Healthcare.



just wait till we elect the first woman president.
image what that will bring along.....:eek: free tampons instead of healthcare for every American woman, free shoes instead of cellphones, and she will try to ban football.

keenkeen
01-08-2013, 9:05 AM
just wait till we elect the first woman president.
image what that will bring along.....:eek: free tampons instead of healthcare for every American woman, free shoes instead of cellphones, and she will try to ban football.

Great post...let me just direct link it to the CalGuns "Ladies Forum" and we will see if we can't get you some direct feedback from female gun owners / CalGuns members.

:eek:

X-NewYawker
01-08-2013, 9:09 AM
OP, Your argument only makes sense if Obama thinks he is doing something traitorous by dismantle the constitution. He has already publicly stated that he feels the document was designed to "evolve" and be "living" and lamented that is about what the government "can't do." I truly believe his side thinks they are making a better (Socialist) country by dismantling the constitution.

Oh, and those jack offs in the Press who are helping him are going to be SO surprised when they find out the first Amendment is next!

Tools!

TeddyBallgame
01-08-2013, 9:15 AM
Actually if you haven't noticed Obama has ready banned guns by creating so much panic you can't buy a gun because there are none left to buy :)!i have to LOL on that one too, although I'm not sure if that's the way he wanted it to go down :D

JJE
01-08-2013, 9:31 AM
I think that as long as gun-owners stand firm, there will not be any new, significant gun mis-regulation.

On a historical note, you used the word "treason", and although I understand why you said it, the Constitution specifically defines what treason is:

Article III, Section 3:

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

Treason can only be found against someone who directly wages war against the US or directly aids its enemies.

TeddyBallgame
01-08-2013, 9:53 AM
I think that as long as gun-owners stand firm, there will not be any new, significant gun mis-regulation.

On a historical note, you used the word "treason", and although I understand why you said it, the Constitution specifically defines what treason is:

Article III, Section 3:



Treason can only be found against someone who directly wages war against the US or directly aids its enemies.
yes, :) treason was for dramatical purposes ;)...how would "traitor" fit?

redhead
01-08-2013, 9:54 AM
Great post...let me just direct link it to the CalGuns "Ladies Forum" and we will see if we can't get you some direct feedback from female gun owners / CalGuns members.

:eek:

I can offer some feedback right now - :facepalm: Depends on the woman, doesn't it? If I were president, none of that crap would happen, and I'd work toward restoring our Constitutional liberties. Sandra Fluke, on the other hand ...

kaligaran
01-08-2013, 10:54 AM
just wait till we elect the first woman president.
image what that will bring along.....:eek: free tampons instead of healthcare for every American woman, free shoes instead of cellphones, and she will try to ban football.

Here we go again.

I am a woman.
I only own 3 pairs of shoes, 2 of them Danner military style boots, one pair Nike Shox sneakers.
I worked on the largest football video game in America (name unneded) for 5 years.

Free tampons? Now that I'm for.

The rest of your post is idiotic and unnecessary.

SgtMerc
01-08-2013, 11:06 AM
I think that as long as gun-owners stand firm, there will not be any new, significant gun mis-regulation.

On a historical note, you used the word "treason", and although I understand why you said it, the Constitution specifically defines what treason is:

Article III, Section 3:



Treason can only be found against someone who directly wages war against the US or directly aids its enemies.

So Benghazi doesn't count? Fast and Furious? I guess conspiracy to conceal doesn't apply? F&F might not count, as Mexico isn't an enemy. But the cartels are enemies, no?

glbtrottr
01-08-2013, 11:19 AM
Obama couldn't care less.

The demise of America is a foregone and desirable conclusion on his part. From his actions on oil production, energy policy, uncontrollable and unchecked spending, limitless immigration, intentional growth of entitlement, that this person wants to destroy this country is without question. That is not the issue on the table.

Obama is racing against the clock.

He has 4 years to play the Gun Control game. 4 years. There is no rush. While everyone is distracted with national issues like Gun Control, Obama and his understudies are busy taking away other liberties, funding Egypt and other nations in the expansion of a pro-Islamic and anti-Christian world, and accelerating himself to try to become the most influential Muslim (denied) in history. Chuck Hagel's appointment is just another in a series of hundreds of indicators.

Obama needs to be out of the presidency, sooner better.

Librarian
01-08-2013, 11:38 AM
No 2A content.

No question the President has some 2A issues - but this thread is not about something he has explicitly done affecting 2A