colossians323
07-22-2007, 08:29 AM
Judge Silberman said, the unavoidable conclusion, if the District's argument is accepted, is that the Second Amendment is meaningless.
I never really thought of it this way before, but truly he has a point.
Why did they even need to write it if it wasn't a right for the governed?
You can find the story here (http://www.washingtontimes.com/article/20070720/COMMENTARY/107200024/1012)
I never really thought of it this way before, but truly he has a point.
Why did they even need to write it if it wasn't a right for the governed?
You can find the story here (http://www.washingtontimes.com/article/20070720/COMMENTARY/107200024/1012)