PDA

View Full Version : The UN To Use Appropriate and Gradual Force In Gun Confiscation


goosebump
02-17-2012, 7:07 AM
Disturbing information found on a UN website.
http://armedselfdefense.blogspot.com/

themug626
02-17-2012, 7:44 AM
I hope our contry doesnt fall for the un bull**** treaty. Idk if its me or what but that sounds like what hitler was doin before he invaded and took over the jews. Idk mabe jamacia has a really bad drug smuggling problem i dont know the whole story but hillary clinton does not need to be anywhwere in our government let alone this earth. Thanks for the info bro

SanPedroShooter
02-17-2012, 7:55 AM
Come and try that **** here....

M1A Rifleman
02-17-2012, 8:04 AM
Come and try that **** here....

Uhm, it has already started by means of passing law:

- CA handgun registration,
- CA rifle registration
- CA AW Ban
- UOC Ban
- Limits to CCW
- etc.

monk
02-17-2012, 8:10 AM
Doesn't law enforcement already implement the "gradual use of force"when disarming an individual?

a1c
02-17-2012, 8:33 AM
Not this again. :facepalm:

SilverTauron
02-17-2012, 8:44 AM
This development should not be a surprise to anyone. The United Nations is composed of a majority of governments who view human rights as a joke and "individual liberty" as probable cause for a bullet in the back of the neck in the boss' prison basement.

Having the United States stand as a nation which enforces individual liberty is a pain for the UN in the internet age, where people in despotic governments can log into youtube and see their government's dirty laundry live and in color. If only America would get on the road to socialist serfdom like the rest of the world, then the corrupt dictators won't have to keep the Internet censoring department running 24/7.

As to the subject of disarmament the cycle will not happen like this. If we look at history, nations like Australia and Britain did not just ban guns overnight & begin confiscating . The laws became more & more restrictive over time until confiscation was seen by the masses as a logical step. The time to be concerned is if the United Nations makes deals with individual state governments. Far as I know that is not legal, but if a UN NGO collaborates with the New Jersey State Police in seizing firearms we may then have something to get paranoid about. This article details an event which happens with sad regularity all over the world, as most nations across the economic spectrum justifiably fear an armed population of citizens.

taperxz
02-17-2012, 8:51 AM
Constitution trumps any UN crapola.

Dupe x1000. And IBTL.

SanPedroShooter
02-17-2012, 8:57 AM
Constitution trumps any UN crapola.

Dupe x1000. And IBTL.

Like I said, try it here. CA law has little to do with the UN.

When this thread gets blasted, do I get to keep my post count?

Apocalypsenerd
02-17-2012, 9:32 AM
I'm wondering if the first two posts are trolls.

SanPedroShooter
02-17-2012, 9:52 AM
I know mine is....

motorhead
02-17-2012, 10:44 AM
Constitution trumps any UN crapola.

Dupe x1000. And IBTL.

THIS! with heller and mc donald even more so. more NWO fearmongering drivel.

ja308
02-17-2012, 11:35 AM
Ignore your rights , they will go away !

POLICESTATE
02-17-2012, 11:39 AM
Cold dead hands. How's that for appropriate and gradual?

That website is weird, why do they list people wanted by INTERPOL? I don't care who's wanted by INTERPOL.

shy 7th
02-17-2012, 12:06 PM
so... time for a Calguns group boating accident?

POLICESTATE
02-17-2012, 12:24 PM
so... time for a Calguns group boating accident?

The whole boat would sink under the weight. We're best off doing it individually for safety's sake!

RMP91
02-17-2012, 12:36 PM
Let's see... 32 million "Sane" gun owners vs this "New World Order"...

It's pretty much a one-sided contest, guess who wins? (HINT: It's not the UN).

ja308
02-17-2012, 12:54 PM
Let's see... 32 million "Sane" gun owners vs this "New World Order"...

It's pretty much a one-sided contest, guess who wins? (HINT: It's not the UN).

The fact remains ,out of those 32Million gun owners , 28 million do not even have the guts to join NRA or any other gun rights group!


That leaves at most 4 million ,out of those 4 million ,at least half believe the NRA is not reasonable ,when it comes to compromise. Read calgunner's posts for verification of the above.


That leaves 2 million at most , take out all the NRA folks over 60 ,that leaves maybe 500,000.

of those 500,000 -490,000 cannot hit a deer size target at 100yds w/.o aid of a bench . Hardly the deterent envisioned by the founders thinking .

The only solution is to elect those who do not sign on to UN agenda .
Unfortunately ,states with the largest population DO sign on to the UN agenda .

Think the army will sign off on UN agenda?google or get the book on Micheal New.

odysseus
02-17-2012, 12:56 PM
Screw the UN.

The real issue is here. Remember with SCOTUS, both Heller and McDonald were 5-4 decisions. 5-4! Close by 1 judge.

That is why above all the noise out there, Obama getting another 4 years is bad for 2-A and RKBA.

sholling
02-17-2012, 1:39 PM
Not this again. :facepalm:

THIS! with heller and mc donald even more so. more NWO fearmongering drivel.
The head in the sand reaction is to trash these posts and in doing so reject reality. The fact remains that we are only one Heller-5 stroke, heart attack, or retirement from a Supreme Court appointment that not only reverses Heller but also says that international law trumps the constitution. The cost of freedom is vigilance and trashing people for being vigilant is a big part of how you lose your freedom.

wjc
02-17-2012, 4:38 PM
Yet another reason for the U.S. to defund and boot the UN out of the country.

Wherryj
02-17-2012, 5:56 PM
The head in the sand reaction is to trash these posts and in doing so reject reality. The fact remains that we are only one Heller-5 stroke, heart attack, or retirement from a Supreme Court appointment that not only reverses Heller but also says that international law trumps the constitution. The cost of freedom is vigilance and trashing people for being vigilant is a big part of how you lose your freedom.

I agree. Some people are seeing this as "the sky is falling". That isn't true. However, vigilance is needed with any incremental attempts to destroy ANY of our freedoms.

Too many politically appointed "activist" judges have eroded the protections granted in the Constitution to the point that the founding fathers would scarcely recognize the system that they established.

I also worry about the "Heller 5", to the point that should any of them be viewing this forum I'd be happy to take any medical questions to help keep them going a LONG time...;)

I can only hope that they are seeing the VERY BEST physicians available.

stitchnicklas
02-17-2012, 7:49 PM
:facepalm::facepalm::facepalm:

Tarn_Helm
02-17-2012, 8:16 PM
Disturbing information found on a UN website.
http://armedselfdefense.blogspot.com/

Where is the NRA?

Has the NRA asked any of the candidates to address the question of who they would appoint as ambassador to the UN to protect our rights?

John Bolton was our man there back when Georgie was POTUS.

Who would fill the spot if Romney could win?

(That goofball Newt could never win--nor could that charlatan "Ron 'the 19th century Isolationist' Paul.")

Fjold
02-17-2012, 8:22 PM
That's not a UN website.

If you're going to post stuff at least list the source correctly.

wjc
02-17-2012, 8:42 PM
Where is the NRA?

Has the NRA asked any of the candidates to address the question of who they would appoint as ambassador to the UN to protect our rights?

John Bolton was our man there back when Georgie was POTUS.

Who would fill the spot if Romney could win?

(That goofball Newt could never win--nor could that charlatan "Ron 'the 19th century Isolationist' Paul.")

Wayne LaPierre addressed the UN on 7/15/2011

http://www.opposingviews.com/i/society/guns/nras-wayne-lapierre-addresses-un-anti-gun-elitists

cortayack
02-17-2012, 8:46 PM
Let's see... 32 million "Sane" gun owners vs this "New World Order"...

It's pretty much a one-sided contest, guess who wins? (HINT: It's not the UN).

The people of the "NWO" won't battle 32 million gun owners, instead they will control your currency and food soucres......When majority of the people are starving, they will give in!

Neptune
02-17-2012, 8:55 PM
Cold dead hands. How's that for appropriate and gradual?

That website is weird, why do they list people wanted by INTERPOL? I don't care who's wanted by INTERPOL.

I love Interpol!! Those guys are awesome! ;)


BgROCTkVHJY



__

wjc
02-17-2012, 9:44 PM
135693

:D