PDA

View Full Version : Scott v. DC Housing Authority (NRA case)


hoffmang
07-22-2011, 7:27 PM
Today, NRA filed (http://www.archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.dcd.149304/gov.uscourts.dcd.149304.1.0.pdf) a case against the DC housing authority. Docket here (http://www.archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.dcd.149304/gov.uscourts.dcd.149304.docket.html).

This is a mirror case to the case to the NRA case that San Francisco's housing authority settled.

-Gene

Paladin
07-22-2011, 7:54 PM
Today, NRA filed (http://www.archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.dcd.149304/gov.uscourts.dcd.149304.1.0.pdf) a case against the DC housing authority. Docket here (http://www.archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.dcd.149304/gov.uscourts.dcd.149304.docket.html).

This is a mirror case to the case to the NRA case that San Francisco's housing authority settled.

-Gene
What? The NRA copied their own case? :eek:

I thought the NRA only copies Gura's and SAF's cases. ;) :D

sighere
07-22-2011, 7:57 PM
Today, NRA filed (http://www.archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.dcd.149304/gov.uscourts.dcd.149304.1.0.pdf) a case against the DC housing authority. Docket here (http://www.archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.dcd.149304/gov.uscourts.dcd.149304.docket.html).

This is a mirror case to the case to the NRA case that San Francisco's housing authority settled.

-Gene

Gotta love the complaint. Substitute Free Speech instead of "firearms" or "ammunition" in the lease agreement and it comes pretty darn clear how these people's rights are being steamrolled.

hoffmang
07-22-2011, 8:06 PM
What? The NRA copied their own case? :eek:

I thought the NRA only copies Gura's and SAF's cases. ;) :D

:smilielol5:

Seriously - I applaud them for a good case that they should do an excellent job upon.

-Gene

CHS
07-22-2011, 8:44 PM
I was just listening to this on the NRA's daily news.

Apparently, the leases used to not ban firearms. Then they added the language around the time of Heller. THEN after Heller or McDonald they put out a notice saying they were going to review their "No Firearms" policy. Then crickets.

The lawyer in this case even sent them an official letter asking if they had actually reviewed their policy and/or changed it in light of Heller/McDonald, and again crickets.

These anti-rights morons have so much wrong with them...

Crom
07-22-2011, 8:59 PM
The rights of the people will not be subverted. Go NRA!

Connor P Price
07-23-2011, 1:17 AM
This is good to see, should be a slam dunk.

wildhawker
07-23-2011, 2:35 AM
What? The NRA copied their own case? :eek:

I thought the NRA only copies Gura's and SAF's cases. ;) :D

This is better than TBS. Seriously funny. :chris::D

Al Norris
07-23-2011, 7:53 AM
Hopefully, this won't be the debacle that is ensuing in another NRA case: Doe v. Wilmington Housing Authority et al. That docket is here (http://www.archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.ded.44289/gov.uscourts.ded.44289.docket.html).

Read filing #89, to see how bad that case is.

In that case, the plaintiffs were not properly vetted. The State tried to involve the NRA attorney in mitigating the damages and that attorney failed (miserably) in all aspects towards mitigation.

Kid Stanislaus
07-23-2011, 7:50 PM
:smilielol5: Seriously - I applaud them for a good case that they should do an excellent job upon. -Gene

ANYTIME gun control gets pushed back just an inch, that's a really good thing.;)

Window_Seat
07-23-2011, 7:55 PM
This is why I am an NRA Life Member. I would encourage others to do the same.

Erik.

safewaysecurity
07-23-2011, 8:01 PM
Good on their part.