PDA

View Full Version : Jerry Brown in 1992


titankeith
10-28-2010, 8:43 AM
...whne he thought he was through with Politics...and now he's back. How can anyone back this douche? granted, I'm NO fan of Meg, but to bring back a "Serial Politician" is the worst thing we can do.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KjlXkM9b4Wg&feature=player_embedded

titankeith
10-28-2010, 8:45 AM
and recently....


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=woGTEIag_Cw&feature=related

BluNorthern
10-28-2010, 8:49 AM
...whne he thought he was through with Politics...and now he's back. How can anyone back this douche? granted, I'm NO fan of Meg, but to bring back a "Serial Politician" is the worst thing we can do.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KjlXkM9b4Wg&feature=player_embeddedThis must be posted at least 4 times in different threads here. As I stated before, an honest remark from a politician for once...and 36 seconds?...where's the rest of the interview to give it some perspective and/or context. Not endorsing Brown..just saying.

titankeith
10-28-2010, 8:54 AM
sorry...I'm a relative noob here, but I was waiting for the "honesty" retort...as if that is a good reason to vote for him because he admits he's a liar? So if we admit we're liars then we get kudos and sanctions for more?:confused:

BluNorthern
10-28-2010, 9:01 AM
sorry...I'm a relative noob here, but I was waiting for the "honesty" retort...as if that is a good reason to vote for him because he admits he's a liar? So if we admit we're liars then we get kudos and sanctions for more?:confused:LOL, I've posted my share of dupes! I'm not sanctioning Brown, but lying IS the standard in politics, not the exception, it's the nature of the beast I guess. Meg, unfortunately, has virtually no record to fall back regarding veracity since she is an unknown factor and has little on record..IMO.

DannyInSoCal
10-28-2010, 9:04 AM
Comical.

Brown admits to openly lying - And people think its somehow acceptable because all politicians lie...?

No wonder CA and our country is quickly becoming a socialized third world power.

If someone openly admits they lied about lowering taxes and increasing jobs -

YOU DONT TRUST THEM AGAIN.

It really is that simple...

J-cat
10-28-2010, 9:05 AM
...whne he thought he was through with Politics...and now he's back. How can anyone back this douche? granted, I'm NO fan of Meg, but to bring back a "Serial Politician" is the worst thing we can do.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KjlXkM9b4Wg&feature=player_embedded


You suport one candidate so that another doesn't get elected.

DannyInSoCal
10-28-2010, 9:11 AM
...whne he thought he was through with Politics...and now he's back. How can anyone back this douche? granted, I'm NO fan of Meg, but to bring back a "Serial Politician" is the worst thing we can do.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KjlXkM9b4Wg&feature=player_embedded

Whats up brother Keith !?!?!?!

bwiese
10-28-2010, 9:18 AM
I would suggest that alll Jerry vs Meg campaign threads, if not discussing gun rights, be moved to OT.

This is the 2nd Amend/RKBA forum, so discussions of gun issues is the only relevant thing.

scarville
10-28-2010, 9:30 AM
Two Parties, both lacking in dignity,
In fair California, where we lay our scene,
From ancient grudge break to new mutiny,
Where civil blood makes civil hands unclean.
From forth the fatal loins of these two foes
A pair of star-cross'd candidates make their life;
Whole misadventured piteous overthrows
Do with their election continue their parties' strife.
The fearful passage of deceptive campaigns,
And the continuance of their parties' rage,
Which, but their candidates election, could nought refrain,
Is now the many word traffic of our stage;
The which if you with patient ears attend,
What here shall miss, our toil shall strive to mend.

(Originally the Prologue from Romeo and Juliet)

IBTL!

Havoc70
10-28-2010, 9:35 AM
I would suggest that alll Jerry vs Meg campaign threads, if not discussing gun rights, be moved to OT.

This is the 2nd Amend/RKBA forum, so discussions of gun issues is the only relevant thing.

Apparently the lack of a comma is quite easily missed. I agree, politics should be in OT unless 2A related.

6172crew
10-28-2010, 9:45 AM
Apparently the lack of a comma is quite easily missed. I agree, politics should be in OT unless 2A related.

Its been that way since 2004. The period confuses members (newer members).