PDA

View Full Version : Law suit in NJ to remove 1 gun per month law


sreiter
01-18-2010, 11:23 AM
ANJRPC SUES TO THROW OUT CORZINE'S ONE GUN A MONTH LAW!

Federal Lawsuit Comes in Direct Response to Lawmakers' Broken Promise to Create a Meaningful Exemption for Honest Collectors and Competitors


Following is the Text of an ANJRPC Press Release
issued on January 17, 2010

The Association of New Jersey Rifle & Pistol Clubs (ANJRPC) announced today that it has filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey to invalidate New Jersey's one gun a month law, in direct response to lawmakers' broken promise to create a meaningful exemption for gun collectors and competitors in the handgun rationing law.

According to ANJRPC President Scott Bach, "Criminals laugh at Corzine's new law, which they can easily thwart, and which fails to punish criminal behavior. It's a thinly disguised attempt to ration the Constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens."

"Lawmakers promised that Corzine's Firearms Task Force would deliver a meaningful exemption for honest gun collectors and competitors, who were not the target of the law. Instead, they rammed through a largely useless and offensive scheme requiring registered gun owners to beg further permission and show why it is not 'feasible or practical' to ration their Constitutional rights every time they wish to make an exempt purchase – a nearly impossible standard to meet," said Bach. "Lawmakers blatantly broke their promise and turned the Task Force into a Task Farce when it came to protecting the Constitutional rights of honest citizens. Their actions forced us to sue, and have now jeopardized the very existence of their feel-good law."

The lawsuit is based on a federal statute that pre-empts state and local laws regulating the sale of certain firearms. The new law runs directly afoul of that statute because of the way New Jersey’s ultra-strict laws sweepingly define firearms. The suit also asserts claims based on the failure of the State Police to implement procedures under the new law, as well as the unlawful rationing of handgun permits by individual municipalities. A copy of the complaint is available at http://www.anjrpc.org/NJ_OGM_Complaint.pdf

New Jersey’s one gun a month law was passed by the legislature in June by a single vote, despite overwhelming evidence that it could be easily circumvented by criminals, failed to address real sources of trafficking, and targeted only law-abiding citizens. Gun rationing laws passed in other states have either been shown ineffective or repealed.

Ironically, the New Jersey law ignores known sources of New Jersey gun trafficking, like the Fedex gun theft ring that stole hundreds of handguns from legal shipments in 2008 and distributed them illegally on the streets of Jersey City and Newark. The law only regulates conduct by law-abiding citizens who have been thoroughly investigated by law enforcement and certified by the State as acceptable to own firearms.

WokMaster1
01-18-2010, 11:50 AM
Good to see the folks in Jersey fight back. One step at a time. If they win, I guarantee our version will fall, too.

xxdabroxx
01-18-2010, 1:33 PM
cannot wait, go NJ!

IrishPirate
01-18-2010, 1:41 PM
New Jersey’s one gun a month law was passed by the legislature in June by a single vote, despite overwhelming evidence that it could be easily circumvented by criminals, failed to address real sources of trafficking, and targeted only law-abiding citizens. Gun rationing laws passed in other states have either been shown ineffective or repealed.

When is this going to ring true in CA????

Bug Splat
01-18-2010, 1:49 PM
I experienced this stupid law first hand this month. Received 3 handguns but I can only take one home a month :(

wildhawker
01-18-2010, 3:03 PM
When is this going to ring true in CA????

Patience, please. Don't think for a second that these laws aren't on the mind of those at CGF and throughout the coalition.

press1280
01-18-2010, 3:11 PM
The first line of the article is a little disturbing. Instead of groups trying to get the whole thing invalidated, they all just tried to get their own little exceptions(sound familiar with other pieces of legislation?).
They ought to just wait for McDonald and go for more than just removing this piece of garbage.

sreiter
01-18-2010, 5:18 PM
The first line of the article is a little disturbing. Instead of groups trying to get the whole thing invalidated, they all just tried to get their own little exceptions(sound familiar with other pieces of legislation?).
They ought to just wait for McDonald and go for more than just removing this piece of garbage.

i think it passed with that provision , as in, the groups let it go unchallenged if xyz

I saw the same thing happen in sacto - some bill was in committee, and the NRA said its bad because xyz, the sponsor said, he would work with the nra on a final draft before it hits the floor if the committee would pass it. NRA said GTG ....