PDA

View Full Version : Question for LEOs...


CavTrooper
04-29-2009, 8:23 PM
Do you personally belive that CA firearms laws are Constitutional?

SkyStorm82
04-29-2009, 8:33 PM
BLUE WALL!!! BLUE WALL!!!

cope113
04-29-2009, 8:55 PM
Ha Ha Ha.

1911su16b870
04-29-2009, 9:34 PM
Heller affirmed Californians have a constitutional right to keep and bear arms.

paladin4415
04-29-2009, 10:01 PM
No, I think many of California's firearms laws fall outside the Constitutional limits. Although it seems some courts read the Constitution differently than I do.

tyrist
04-29-2009, 10:13 PM
Nope

GuyW
04-29-2009, 10:19 PM
Heller affirmed Californians have a constitutional right to keep and bear arms.


Nordyke?

.

BigDogatPlay
04-29-2009, 10:53 PM
I think the roster, coupled with LEOs being able to buy unfettered from off the roster, is an equal protection violation. Always have.

A number of our other laws are questionable at best, and I am expecting them to ultimately be ruled infringements. Until they are found to be infringements then they are, by definition, constitutional.

bluestaterebel
04-29-2009, 11:12 PM
i think most people here tend to think that the gun laws are unconsitutional but come on youre preaching to the choir, law enforcement or not.

besides, the people who sit on the highest court of the land cant even agree on whats constitutional.

1911su16b870
04-30-2009, 5:17 PM
Nordyke?

Absolutely!

CavTrooper
05-06-2009, 12:05 PM
212 views, 9 responses.

Does the question make some folks feel uncomfortable or what?

scootergmc
05-06-2009, 8:19 PM
Maybe only the LEOs are answering... or not. :gene:

Snake9
05-07-2009, 11:04 PM
Do you personally belive that CA firearms laws are Constitutional?
States like Kalifornia & New Jersey have no State RKBA clause in their Constitutions, a "loophole" exploited by gun-hating politicians to sidestep the 2nd Amendment. Bragging that their state anti-gun "laws" should be "examples for the nation" (*cough-Feinstien*-cough*) while knowing full well this is a con job since most other states supremes would reject them out of hand based on their state RKBA clause. Disgusting things like the Clinton ban, based on the Kalifornia model, only get through by exploiting the constitutionally ignorant or the intentionally evil, and there are all too many of these out there...But of course, this raises the specter of the Federalist/Anti-Federalist debate, which, especially when it comes to gun laws, is a whole different can of worms, and a subject I have yet to see anyone on the boards bring up for discussion...:hide:

818gtiguy
05-07-2009, 11:32 PM
HELL YES, I think they are unconstitutional....:willy_nilly:

7222 Hawker
05-11-2009, 1:08 AM
Do you personally belive that CA firearms laws are Constitutional?

No way. Thats why they give us DISCRETION!!

Ron-Solo
05-17-2009, 4:27 PM
Nope. They are stupid.

eta34
05-17-2009, 6:11 PM
Of course I don't.

trendar5
05-17-2009, 6:41 PM
Personally, as an LEO, I just LOVE having to beg out-of state dealers to sell me guns and magazines, sending extra documentation, paying more, etc. It's the best....NOT! We should all be able to buy the "unsafe" colored frames, unsafe beavertails on Sigs, etc.

I finally found some common ground with CavTrooper....I'm floored.