PDA

View Full Version : Email from La Pierre on Obama, job applicants to his admin. asked about guns


Creeping Incrementalism
12-06-2008, 09:57 PM
I received this email blast from "Wayne LaPierre [Wayne_LaPierre.UM.A.2.12060@www.nranews.org]", subject "Post election gun ban alert". It says Obama is asking all applying for jobs in his administration if they own guns. It also says new membership cards are being sent out, and asks everyone to validate them as soon as possible. Is this legit?

Email follows below:

**** Alert *** Alert *** Alert ****

Dear Fellow NRA Member,

In the next few days, you'll receive your new NRA membership card.

The moment you receive it, I urge you to validate your new membership card as soon as possible. More than ever, we need you to stand with NRA and fight to save our Second Amendment freedoms.


Because Barack Obama's campaign promise
not to take away our guns is a lie.

He's not even in office, yet he's fired the opening salvos in a war against the future of the Second Amendment, our hunting and shooting traditions, and YOU.

Obama's FIRST attack on YOU: Appointing Illinois Congressman Rahm Emanuel to be White House Chief of Staff. In Congress, Emanuel earned an "F" rating from NRA, and while working in the Clinton Administration, he was known as the "point man on gun control." He is an avowed enemy of the Second Amendment and will wield enormous power in the battle for the future of our firearm freedoms.

Obama's SECOND attack on YOU: If Hillary Clinton is confirmed as Secretary of State, she'll rip the Second Amendment right out of the Bill of Rights. She'll be our nation's top diplomat with the power to determine whether the United Nations will pass, and Obama will sign, a global gun ban treaty that will surrender our Second Amendment rights and our national sovereignty.

Obama's THIRD attack on YOU: Nominating ex-Senator and former Majority Leader Tom Daschle-an avowed enemy of NRA-to be Secretary of Health and Human Services. NRA was responsible for defeating Daschle when he ran in South Dakota for re-election to the Senate. If Daschle is confirmed, he could hold the ultimate power to declare guns a "public health menace" and regulate away our essential liberties.

Obama's FOURTH attack on YOU: Nominating Eric Holder to be Attorney General. As former Assistant Attorney General, Holder was a key architect and vocal advocate for the Clinton era's sweeping gun ban agenda. He supported national handgun licensing, mandatory trigger locks, and ending gun shows as we know them.

Just recently, Holder opposed the District of Columbia's Heller decision that declared the Second Amendment an individual right. Holder also called for reviving the Clinton gun bans and, as Attorney General, would fight in court to prevent the landmark Heller decision from being made applicable to state and local governments.

Worst of all, if Holder is confirmed as the nation's top law-enforcement officer, he would control BATFE and wield enormous power to harass gun owners and sue America's arms makers out of existence.

Obama's FIFTH attack on YOU: In the job application for the Obama Administration, he made it clear that gun owners are second-class citizens and told 80 million gun owners not to even bother applying for a job. In the "White House Personnel Data Questionnaire" he asked:

"Do you or any members of your immediate family own a gun? If so, provide
complete ownership and registration information. Has the registration ever
lapsed? Please also describe how and by whom it is used and whether it has
been the cause of any personal injuries or property damage."

This chilling notice to gun owners-that they are not welcome to serve in his Administration-shows the deep hostility for Americans' Second Amendment Freedoms that Obama and his Administration have in their hearts.

On its face, that question endorses gun registration-a mandate in only five states in our nation-and buys into the anti-gun premise that firearms are inherently dangerous and gun owners are prone to misusing them.

That's an outrageous mindset, especially for the President-elect whose sworn duty will be to uphold the U.S. Constitution, including our right to keep and bear arms.

Obama CLEARLY wants to make gun registration the law of the land.

First for employees under his control...AND THEN FOR YOU.

Working with a Congress dominated by gun haters like Nancy Pelosi, Dianne Feinstein, John Conyers, Henry Waxman, and Charles Schumer!!!

Rubbing salt in gun owner wounds is the Brady Campaign, which just issued a completely bogus poll claiming that two-thirds of the Americans-including 60% of all gun owners-favor gun registration, licensing of firearm owners, and other sweeping restrictions on our firearm freedoms!


Add it all up and you have the potential
for a Second Amendment disaster that's unlike
any other NRA members have ever battled.

That's why we need the strongest possible commitment from EVERY NRA member, starting today. That's why I'm hoping you'll validate your new NRA membership card the moment you receive it.

Because our greatest strength is you.

Only by working with you can NRA hold the line against these threats from every quarter. We are the one force that has the strength to keep Americans free and our rights intact for future generations. With you at our side, we will fight and we will prevail against all odds.

Thank you for your loyalty to NRA and the cause of Freedom.





Forward this E-Mail to Friends
and Urge Them to Join NRA Today!


----------------------------------
National Rifle Association * 11250 Waples Mill Road * Fairfax, VA 22030
If you would like to remove yourself from this list, please click here and you will be removed immediately. Thank you.

NiteQwill
12-06-2008, 10:14 PM
Yea, got my new membership card today.

otalps
12-06-2008, 11:14 PM
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1108/15835.html

Firblitz
12-06-2008, 11:33 PM
That just made me sign up for the NRA. I know they aren't perfect, but we need all the help we can get to fight these guys.

rayra
12-07-2008, 11:52 AM
A major lobbying group like the NRA being (only) two weeks behind the news probably used to be considered satisfactory. We're on internet-time now. The NRA missed a prime opportunity for free press coverage and popular attention by not jumping onto this Obama Machine litmus test the moment the story broke two weeks ago. Now any NRA public statement on it will just get ignored in passing.

/course it's a far too late to be trying to define Obama as anti-gun, a month AFTER he got elected

//yah, obviously I'm not happy with the NRA. I used to be a member. I'll probably be one again in the near future. But their sluggishness, obtuseness, compromise-catering and deliberate obstructionism in Heller-Parker need to be corrected to increase their effectiveness. They cannot continue this rabble-rousing 'lobbying as usual' BS.

Full Clip
12-07-2008, 12:49 PM
Uh, I'm sorry, but are BO's actions/appointments a surprise to anybody?

hawk1
12-07-2008, 01:00 PM
Uh, I'm sorry, but are BO's actions/appointments a surprise to anybody?

Only the lemmings that blindly voted for him...Many on this board, that should have known better.

I still say only voted for him for their own personal gain. ie, how much will BO put in my pocket.

bulgron
12-07-2008, 01:11 PM
I still say only voted for him for their own personal gain. ie, how much will BO put in my pocket.

The really funny (not really) thing is that BO is ultimately going to take from everyone's pocket. At the moment he's promising the largest public works project since the great depression. Fair enough, a lot of our national infrastructure needs repairing. Problem is, he's currently claiming that he's not going to raise taxes.

So where, pray tell, is all the money going to come from to pay for these massive new projects?

I can think if a lot of answers to that question; none of which will make anyone happy.

Someday, somehow, the bill is going to have to get paid.

Creeping Incrementalism
12-07-2008, 02:12 PM
Yea, got my new membership card today.

Was a new card due? I am wondering if everyone getting a new card regardless.

acolytes
12-07-2008, 02:20 PM
Only the lemmings that blindly voted for him...Many on this board, that should have known better.

I still say only voted for him for their own personal gain. ie, how much will BO put in my pocket.

This comes to mind when I read your post. haha

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P36x8rTb3jI

acolytes
12-07-2008, 02:20 PM
Uh, I'm sorry, but are BO's actions/appointments a surprise to anybody?

+1000

yellowfin
12-07-2008, 05:35 PM
The question isn't what he wants to do, what he will do, etc. That has been beaten to death on this board since March. What we need to focus on now is how to stop him. Anyone have constructive thoughts on that???

bulgron
12-07-2008, 05:59 PM
The question isn't what he wants to do, what he will do, etc. That has been beaten to death on this board since March. What we need to focus on now is how to stop him. Anyone have constructive thoughts on that???

I believe we can jam up Congress pretty good so that no new gun control legislation gets through. There's been a lot of analysis on here about Democrats who come from conservative districts, so I won't rehash that. We'll just have to make sure to call and write those congress critters who lean our way when the bills inevitably pop up.

I don't know what we can do about last-minute amendments to popular bills that have nothing to do with gun control. I suppose we'll just have to be ready to deal with those in court.

I have no idea what can be done about Obama's executive authority and his ability to mess with us on that front, except for maybe more court battles.

For the next two years we're in deep doo-doo. The ball is entirely in Obama's court.

yellowfin
12-07-2008, 06:25 PM
^ That is, of course, if we don't get him thrown out by the ineligibility investigations. The whole non-US citizen bit is pretty solid, especially since he's been documented having travelled on non US passports. Perhaps push that?

bulgron
12-07-2008, 06:47 PM
^ That is, of course, if we don't get him thrown out by the ineligibility investigations. The whole non-US citizen bit is pretty solid, especially since he's been documented having travelled on non US passports. Perhaps push that?

I don't think it has legs, and even if it does what makes you think whoever might take his place will be any better?

Anyway, I don't see anywhere where dual-citizens are ineligible. He simply has to be a native-born US citizen. While I believe there may be evidence to suggest that he isn't native-born, it doesn't look to me like it's easily provable in court -- especially since the courts seem anxious to not deal with this hot potato.